🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an cute small “playful character”. Orion – called “Onion” – is a large but guardian-like companion. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a worm. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a kind nature.

A group of thirty captive beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have been caught in a tussle between a closed attraction, local and national governments and advocacy groups.

But those closest to the whales say the impassioned controversy over their future often overlooks the nuances of the whales who, after growing up in enclosed habitats, have been closely studied by the humans who interact with them daily.

After the national authorities disallowed the export of the belugas to China, the embattled amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are held threatened to end their lives unless the federal government funds the upkeep of keeping them alive. Canada’s marine resources official has rejected that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable position.

Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures

Researchers say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, cognitive challenges and communal behavior suggest they are remarkably smart mammals – something Kristy Burgess learned directly.

Burgess spent three years as a whale caretaker, a job that required building relationships of the marine predators.

“Developing those connections over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of care. At the beginning, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so magical and gratifying.”

Burgess knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nevertheless amazed by the details and idiosyncrasies in their personalities. She formed a particular love for Eve and Cleopatra with different natures.

“One whale chose me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “Each transformed the way I understand connection.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Burgess’s connection with the whales developed against a context of rising activist criticism to their enclosure.

During her three years at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s one orca, the orca, passed away. In all, nineteen belugas have died at the park since recent years, a statistic which the facility attributes to natural mortality, but which activists say indicates the poor conditions in which they were housed.

The facility did not open to the public over the recent season, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes effects of the cessation. “Structural materials is breaking off from the tanks because they’re falling apart and not being repaired. The whales are curious and so they grab fragments and swim around with pieces in their mouth. It’s distressing to see.”

The facility did not reply to a inquiry, but earlier stated: “The whales … get far superior veterinary services and around the clock care than any person in the Britain, or other places.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was fired from the facility in early March following the passing of a beluga, an sick beluga the caretakers had to humanely kill. She said the facility suspected particulars of the incident were leaked to the media and she was let go not long after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ future has left Burgess and staff members in anguish. She says the park’s threat to end the lives of its whales is a leverage tool and is a “logistically impossible” undertaking, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a individual beluga would require “considerable personnel”, trucks and machinery.

“It’s impossible in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess backs calls for the whales to be transferred promptly from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and reduced personnel.

In the autumn, Canada’s fisheries minister denied a bid to export the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the proposal would have meant a perpetual existence in confinement and a return to display for amusement,” the official wrote. “As the public, we know that marine mammals should be in the wild, not in pools for our enjoyment. I could not in good conscience permit an export that would prolong the situation these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the official’s statements reflect a more general misunderstanding of the realities of living conditions for belugas raised in confinement.

“The public needs to grasp these are whales that have lived entirely in confinement and they will need ongoing assistance for the rest of their years,” she said. “Many just don’t comprehend that it’s not as easy as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As authorities attempt to find a resolution, suggestions have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. One proposal called for the belugas to be freed into the open waters of Canada’s north – where whales are a primary resource of food for Inuit communities.

A proposed refuge in the province of Nova Scotia, which recently received regulatory clearance, has been most controversial. The prospective facility, which includes a large area of enclosed sea water, is not yet built. Supporters remain optimistic that it could ultimately represent a sustainable resolution for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s consulted, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “simply an experiment” in the whales’ future.

Some experts say the idea of a sanctuary indicates a changing attitudes away from animal displays and could represent a feasible approach in the coming months.

Charles Vinick, head of the sanctuary project, said the location will mimic the cognitive activities and nutrition the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a much larger environment. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|